I have scrutinized the literature. I have a Ph.D. and a J.D., both from Harvard. The story of Jesus is improbable. But, aside from that, there are numerous other books, etc. One is "The Christ Conspiracy" by Acharya S (Dorothy Murdoch.) Do you believe that Gabriel dictated the contents of the Qur'an to an illiterate desert dweller over a…
I have scrutinized the literature. I have a Ph.D. and a J.D., both from Harvard. The story of Jesus is improbable. But, aside from that, there are numerous other books, etc. One is "The Christ Conspiracy" by Acharya S (Dorothy Murdoch.) Do you believe that Gabriel dictated the contents of the Qur'an to an illiterate desert dweller over a 24-year period, or that the contents of the Book of Mormon were handed down by God? In short, people believe what they want to believe. It's the first fallacy in critical thinking - confirmation bias.
Oh go piss off. This was about the evidence for the historical person who was Jesus. NOT whether he was the Son of God. That's theology. NOT about partticular beliefs. Geez. Bye.
I have scrutinized the literature. I have a Ph.D. and a J.D., both from Harvard. The story of Jesus is improbable. But, aside from that, there are numerous other books, etc. One is "The Christ Conspiracy" by Acharya S (Dorothy Murdoch.) Do you believe that Gabriel dictated the contents of the Qur'an to an illiterate desert dweller over a 24-year period, or that the contents of the Book of Mormon were handed down by God? In short, people believe what they want to believe. It's the first fallacy in critical thinking - confirmation bias.
Oh go piss off. This was about the evidence for the historical person who was Jesus. NOT whether he was the Son of God. That's theology. NOT about partticular beliefs. Geez. Bye.