Although Jesus may have existed as a mortal human and not a god, even the evidence of his existence is shaky. Nevertheless, it is debatable. I personally have a bigger problem accepting the bible as an accurate historical record. It's full of great reading but just i…
Although Jesus may have existed as a mortal human and not a god, even the evidence of his existence is shaky. Nevertheless, it is debatable. I personally have a bigger problem accepting the bible as an accurate historical record. It's full of great reading but just isn't plausible.
I certainly cannot believe Jesus was "god." He may have existed, but as a man only. And the evidence is not clear.
https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/did-jesus-exist/
https://ffrf.org/component/k2/item/18412-debunking-the-historical-jesus
https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/18/did-historical-jesus-exist-the-traditional-evidence-doesnt-hold-up/
Although Jesus may have existed as a mortal human and not a god, even the evidence of his existence is shaky. Nevertheless, it is debatable. I personally have a bigger problem accepting the bible as an accurate historical record. It's full of great reading but just isn't plausible.
I certainly cannot believe Jesus was "god." He may have existed, but as a man only. And the evidence is not clear.
That’s what I said.