I’m in agreement with you to a degree; I see “collateral damage” as a bit more nefarious as it implies the kids are disposable and not considered in earnest; when the result is viewed as an “unfortunate outcome” it is reduced to “an obstacle” that can be overcome
by hard work, work ethic, and all other solutions aimed at blaming those impacted by poor legislation.
I’m in agreement with you to a degree; I see “collateral damage” as a bit more nefarious as it implies the kids are disposable and not considered in earnest; when the result is viewed as an “unfortunate outcome” it is reduced to “an obstacle” that can be overcome
by hard work, work ethic, and all other solutions aimed at blaming those impacted by poor legislation.
I’m in agreement with you to a degree; I see “collateral damage” as a bit more nefarious as it implies the kids are disposable and not considered in earnest; when the result is viewed as an “unfortunate outcome” it is reduced to “an obstacle” that can be overcome
by hard work, work ethic, and all other solutions aimed at blaming those impacted by poor legislation.