Also, all law is archaic. It’s based in principles that are in many cases ancient, and it doesn’t lend itself to the way people think things “ought” to be. The court isn’t charged with considering the interests of either parent, but the best interests of a child.
This law was established under the doctrine that it’s in the best interest o…
Also, all law is archaic. It’s based in principles that are in many cases ancient, and it doesn’t lend itself to the way people think things “ought” to be. The court isn’t charged with considering the interests of either parent, but the best interests of a child.
This law was established under the doctrine that it’s in the best interest of a child to have two parents. You can agree or disagree (I’ve argued both sides in individual cases) but the doctrine exists.
Also, all law is archaic. It’s based in principles that are in many cases ancient, and it doesn’t lend itself to the way people think things “ought” to be. The court isn’t charged with considering the interests of either parent, but the best interests of a child.
This law was established under the doctrine that it’s in the best interest of a child to have two parents. You can agree or disagree (I’ve argued both sides in individual cases) but the doctrine exists.