Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chuck Schlegel's avatar

I am of the opinion the initiatives to expand workforces to younger ages are intended to expand labor pool and create a lower wage category and enhance bottom lines, with the collateral damage being a lower economic class that stays lower longer. As a career educator who taught almost exclusively students on and in the socio-economic margins, I am all too familiar with the allure of choosing work over school. That, and the consequences of lower academic achievement when balancing work-school balance means ALL learning happens bell-to-bell and no time or resources are available outside the day. These laws these administrations are crafting are sold as a win-win for business and workers; however, those who need the work, those willing to risk personal safety and educational achievement out of financial necessity, and those who already see school as a nuisance when there is money to be made will simply be cast into a perpetuated lower class at the mercy of industry and government.

Expand full comment
Anne Green-Romig's avatar

I too was victimized by my manager at Steak 'n Shake when I was 15... back in 1974 in a St. Louis suburb. I needed a ride home when the restaurant closed (I can't remember the reason for that) and instead of driving me home he drove me to a dead end cul-de-sac and pulled out a condom... I quit the next day and never told a soul. Good on you for reporting; I wish I had. I never even told my parents. Somehow I blamed myself. Young people should not be put in the hands of adult managers; I see your point about Republicans wanting to force people into a working class. You are an amazing writer; thank you for putting two and two together for me.

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts